Monday, August 31, 2009

MHS offers some degree of superiority over stick frame construction

By : Eric Hunting
Part 3
MHS consists of a system of extruded aluminum profile posts and beams similar in nature to those of T-slot framing commonly employed in industrial automation. These are assembled in simple box frames using a concealed bolt-lock clamp which leaves the structure with a clean appearance. This is supplemented by a bolt-in-place diagonal corner brace for multi-story structures which is normally concealed within wall panels. The cladding system uses either Structural Insulated Panels or most any combination of other panel materials which slide into the special grooves of the framing profiles. The panels contribute little to no addition to structural performance so their composition is not critical, all loads being born solely by the post and beams as with traditional post and beam construction.These panels may be pre-finished, composed of materials that need no finishing, or can optionally be finished by conventional house siding, surface mount veneer board, and painted plaster board sheathing. The profile slots also readily accommodate modular window panels or composite panelwalls can be framed to accommodate more conventional windows of any shape. Roofing, supported by a simple roof truss and extruded profile solid web truss rafters, can be either conventional or, more practically, metal panel roofing. Flooring uses the same extruded solid web truss pieces as joistsand can employ any conventional flooring material. Additionally, the joists will also accommodate a clever suspended panel ceiling system. Foundation systems can be conventional curtain or slab foundations or piling foundations typical of many post and beam structures.The greatest feature of MHS is its demountability -precisely the feature that stud frame construction is lacking. With MHS one can freely and quickly disassemble, repair or modify, and reassemble structures without causing any damage to the components and materials using little more than a few hand tools. Combined with the virtues of a modular space frame geometry, this affords the system a flexibility, capability, and economy impossible with stud frame construction. The MHS building is a truly immortal structure -not because its basic materials are more resilient but because all its components can be forever replaced as they wear out and its form can be forever adapted to any use or need.

Our ancestors knew what they were doing when they first adopted post and beam construction. Before industrialization, people had to make most of the things they needed with their own hands and all such work competed for time with the more important priorities of producing food, caring for family, and preparing for seasonal changes. So people were frugal with their time and labor. They built things to last, and in those days that didn't mean futilely trying to defy nature by making things impervious to wear and damage. It meant making sure whatever you made could be repaired, reused, adapted, and recycled perpetually. The post and beam framing system achieved this capability through its demountability and modularity. By being able to be readily taken apart, any individual component could be replaced on demand without effecting the rest of the structure. By using a space frame where the loads were borne by the frame alone, weatherproof enclosure materials could be easily replaced as they wore out and the structure adapted and expanded on demand, since no walls were actually permanent. If you needed more room, you added more to the grid of the frame. If the roles of some rooms changed, you could readily remove or add walls to change the space for its new use. If you needed larger clear-span rooms, you increased the length of beams and posts around those rooms -though this had the caveat of increasing their mass greatly as well when using wood. If situations forced you to move, the whole building could be readily taken apart and rebuilt somewhere else, conserving your labor investment in its fabrication. And in the worst case situation where your house suffered too much damage to be saved or became completely obsolete, all its surviving components could be readily salvaged and directly reused in another structure. Indeed, many of the new wooden post and beam homes built today -for sake of their rustic style- use lumber salvaged from buildings more than a hundred years old!

MHS improves upon these original virtues by taking advantage of modern materials and industrial parts fabrication. Traditional post and beam structures required a high level of skill to craft their key components which tended to be large and difficult for a single person to handle. This is what compelled the old tradition of community barn raising, the components of these wide span structures being far too heavy for any individual farmer to handle alone. By using much lighter and stronger aluminum profiles fabricated by mass production, MHS eliminates the skill overhead associated with fabricating lumber post and beam components and brings the mass of components suitable for a useful range of frame spans down to a level where an individual can easily handle them. Like it's lumber predecessor, MHS still requires an increase in the length and mass of its beams as it increases in span. But because aluminum offers a higher strength-to-weight ratio than lumber it doesn't increase in required mass as fast as lumber does as required spans increase. Thus a fairly modest profile size of 6.75" is sufficient for a very wide range of spans. When the limits of this component scale are reached, the system can readily switch to the use of trusses made out of the same components, switching to a type of structural member with an even higher strength-to-weight ratio but also with a greater volume.

Another limitation of the traditional post and beam system which MHS resolves is the limited demountability in cladding and partition walls. In the past it was generally very difficult to achieve a weatherproof barrier from materials which were not monolithic in nature. Thus while the frame system of post and beam buildings was readily modular and remountable, the materials filling in the space between the frame members for walls often had to employ a compromise. Walls might be based on more 'plastic' materials like clay, cob (a mixture of clay-rich earth like adobe), wattle & daub (mixture of cob-like materials applied to a light grid of thin crossed wood strips coated in plaster) or might use siding attached with nails -even though that did damage the major frame pieces. These materials were not truly remountable but they could be very easily removed and were potentially recyclable. More remountable walls appeared in the traditional construction of Japan. They also relied heavily on their own kind of waddle & daub (though made with bamboo lathe) but complimented this with decorated paper and veneer wood panels, heavy wood planks, and paper shade screens which fit into shallow grooves carved into the post and beam frame. This was generally poorly suited to exterior walls, however, because they were so lightly and loosely attached and was more commonly employed for interiors. The Japanese also developed modular panel flooring in the form of tatami mats -an innovation that never found its equivalent in the west until the invention of raised floor panel systems for computer rooms!

Continue.... http://www.modularhousingsystem.com/

Sunday, August 30, 2009

MHS offers some degree of superiority over stick frame construction

By : Eric Hunting
Part 2
These limitations on structure and its adaptation are reinforced by the reliance on nailed connection and plywood and plaster board use. Using nailed construction, the act of assembly itself permanently damages the material it uses. Upon completion, the structure becomes impossible to modify or repair without first performing some form of surgical demolition causing possible additional damage and producing much waste in the process-since the material is damaged by its construction process and can't be reused. Very little of the material is directly reusable in the event of renovation or demolition. Most of it simply becomes trash when taken apart, ultimately increasing the expense of repair and renovation. While larger pieces of framing can withstand multiple re-nailing using nails in different locations, you can only get away with this a few times. Eventually the integrity of the wood is completely lost and one is compelled to replace it altogether. We like to pretend our homes are built to last forever but in reality they all -if based on stud frame construction- have a built in obsolescence. A point where, because of the nature of this building system, they MUST reach a state of diminishing returns where the cost of repair or renovation becomes higher than total replacement. This inevitable condition tends to be hidden by the tendency of labor and bureaucratic costs to inflate faster than the rate of home deterioration, always keeping the cost of new home construction slightly ahead of old home renovation and perpetuating the illusion that homes appreciate with time. But ultimately this cannot be sustained -especially when homes are relying more and more on materials with less and less reusability, such as SIPs.
Because of these limitations the use of stud frame construction has, in fact, been quite limited. Though originally adopted by farmers to aid in building agricultural structures with solitary labor, today it is ONLY in common use for suburban housing. All other types of buildings -industrial, municipal, commercial, urban mass housing- generally rely on the true traditional technology of post and beam construction, though these days they normally use steel instead of wood. One would think that by now the limitations of stud frame construction would have become so obvious that its use for housing would be in decline. But the public seems largely oblivious, tending to have a poor grasp of history and being easily fooled into thinking that anything which has been around for at least one generation has been a 'tradition' forever. Thus this form of construction has become very ingrained into the culture despite its obvious flaws. People simply have no memory of what came before -and little understanding of what's behind the plaster board and siding in the first place- and so the methods and materials commonly used by the other classes of construction are regarded as 'new' and 'unconventional' even though their roots are thousands of years deep!

Let's now look at MHS. With its reliance on factory fabricated modular aluminum components using quick-connect assembly technology and standardized dimensions, the Modular Housing System of US Systems presents a radically different situation from that of stud frame construction. But its virtues are rooted not in new technology but rather in the practical advantages of traditional post and beam construction. MHS is essentially a traditional post and beam system using a simple rectilinear space frame geometry and a bolted rather than nailed method of assembly. It overcomes the limitations of using large heavy specially crafted lumber -the limitations which compelled the invention of stud framing- through the use of a light weight low cost recyclable material -aluminum- and precision engineered mass produced modular components. It is a system which offers us the best of both worlds; the flexibility, simplicity, and strength of traditional post and beam structures with the labor savings and efficient economics of industrial production. It is the closest we have so far come to the ideal of a plug-in architecture.
Continue....

Saturday, August 29, 2009

MHS offers some degree of superiority over stick frame construction

By : Eric Hunting
Part 1


The Modular Housing System of US SYSTEMS presents a radical new approach to housing construction offering new freedom and capability for the home owner and a new economic model for the housing market. Here we will compare MHS to conventional housing, illuminating the key advantages of this new construction system.
Contrary to popular belief, the wooden stud or, as it's sometimes called, the 'platform' framing system commonly used in contemporary housing is a rather recent invention which had its origins in a building technique called'balloon' framing which appeared in the US Midwest in the 1830s and was popularized by early Do-It-Yourself carpentry and construction books and magazines. Up until that time the predominate framing system for housing construction was the post and beam system which had been in use for thousands of years and which has its variants in every culture and civilization in the world. Stud framing method was developed primarily as a means to save labor and materials, trading the use of skilled carpentry with nail-less joinery for quick and easy nailed construction and large heavy pieces of lumber for smaller lighter pieces that were easier for one person to handle, easier to transport, and which allowed the lumber companies to get a larger percentage of usable lumber out of a given tree with less waste.


Stud frame construction did not start to become ubiquitous for American housing until the 1920s-1930s with the import of the 'garden city' concept from Europe, the growth in automobile use, and the subsequent growing demand for housing outside of urban areas where, for fire safety, masonry had become the predominate construction material. The labor saving, reduced skill virtues of this technique and its use of cheap small piece lumber appealed to builders -especially the mass housing developers that emerged during the post-WWII housing crisis. They faced problems of a need for rapid large volume construction and a steadily declining quality and rising cost of wood. This building technique offered a means to build quickly with what used to be considered quite inferior grade lumber, this virtue aided by the adoption of composite wood products which made what was formerly lumber production waste into a usable product.


Over time this trend to make nominally durable structure from materials of steadily declining quality has evolved into an increasing dependence on the products of organic chemistry. The diagonal dovetail board cladding of early 'balloon' framed structures was replaced by adhesive bonded plywood which now is itself being replaced by Oriented Strand Board made of even cheaper wood and cellulose fiber scrap bound together with more adhesives. The early wood lath supported hand plastered interior wall covering, with its often intricate molded plaster details, was replaced by a laminate of paper and gypsum called 'plaster board' or 'sheet rock' and is now giving way to various forms of paper composite board. The humble 2x4 is now being replaced by laminate lumber made of glued wood strips and wood trusses made of OSB and thin laminate wood pieces. And most recently the whole stud frame system is starting to be replaced by Structural Insulated Panels -a sandwich of OSB and styrofoam. All-in-all, there really isn't much that one could call 'traditional' about this conventional building method. It became the standard simply because it was fast and cheap, and nothing more. And if the current materials trends hold true, it looks like stud frame construction will ultimately evolve into a system where houses are nothing more than various forms of composite paper held together by and wrapped in plastic.


Stud frame construction is based on the concept of a stressed skin structure where the frame and its cladding combine to function as a whole load-bearing system. It's quite similar in nature to the monocoque structures of aircraft, affording a high strength-to-weight ratio but at a cost of a high number of individually fragile components -as anyone who has built model airplanes knows well. In the original 'balloon' framing system the stressed skin structure would be fashioned to span all stories of a home and be unified by a cladding of dove-tail joined planking in a diagonal pattern. In the more contemporary 'platform' system each floor is framed independently and clad in plywood or Oriented Strand Board creating a system of stacked single-story boxes. Altogether, this is an adequately strong and efficient system with great initial design flexibility but it imposes severe limitations on performance and later adaptation.
Structural Insulated Panels represent the latest innovation in this building technology and may eventually replace stud framing while remaining essentially the same building system. Composed of a sandwich of semi-rigid foam insulation and Oriented Strand Board with an edge frame of conventional stud lumber, they function as stressed skin structures in the same way as the stud frame but eliminate all the assembly of intermediate studs and offer the further bonus of built-in insulation. One simply erects the panels in the same places one would build a stud frame and nail them together at their edges. SIP panels offer higher strength-to-weight ratio than stud frame structures and are very quick and easy to assemble but are far more dependent on chemistry for their performance than anything previous. Some have questioned their use as an exterior wall system because of Oriented Strand Board's greater susceptibility to moisture and the potential for deformation of the panels in the event of moisture infiltration -though, of course, polymer chemistry will probably arrive at some quick solution for that too. It's a great labor savings innovation, but also one that amplifies all the inherent limitations of the stud framing it replaces by an order of magnitude!


The greatest limitation of stud frame construction is its non-demountability-its inability to be taken apart without destroying it in order to repair or adapt its structure. With this system walls are the primary load-bearing elements and their arrangement becomes critical to the structural performance of the house. Once built, it becomes very difficult to rearrange the layout of a stud frame home because of the impact of such changes on structural integrity. Change too much and the whole home comes down. Most home designs try to ameliorate this limitation by putting the load bearing dependence primarily on the exterior walls and a few select key interior walls which are assumed to be less likely to need later changes. Innovations in roof truss systems have expanded this capability, allowing for larger clear roof spans with most of the roof load on the perimeter walls alone. But room spans can still be very limited with this system and when homes are expanded at their perimeter it becomes impossible to remove those key load bearing walls when they suddenly become intermediary walls without radical modification of the roof and floor systems.
Continue....

Thursday, August 27, 2009

Innovative prefab components



MHS Modular prefab homes can be completely customized. The floor plans we have in our collection can be altered, or you can come to us with your idea, and our team of architects and engineers can create a complete set of custom home construction documents for you.

Wednesday, August 26, 2009

Aluminum Framing



MHS Aluminum Framing™ is an equivalent to conventional post & beam home design where the structural lumber is replaced by steel posts and beams.

MHS Aluminum Framing™ Framing System features interlocking bolting system, modular grid-type construction built on 4-foot center. Aluminum column Post & Beam member’s bolt-together, while integrated with in file insulated panels for walls, roofs, and floors.

Pre-engineered MHS Aluminum Framing™ post-and-beam-could be supported with MHS tested shear wall and diaphragms. Almost any architectural design can built with this method of construction and its prefabricated components.

Home built with this method can be single-story, two-story, and even tri-level home with shear walls.Unlike conventional wood stick framed home that requires interior walls to support the roof, MHS Aluminum Framing™Text Color house allows to modular span, more open walls with less material and save a lot of space. The result is modern floor layout and interior design flexibility.
Unlike wood, MHS Aluminum Framing™ won’t shrink, rot, warp, buckle, split, or be attacked by insects. Save a lot of trees in the planet.
MHS home with Greater durability, sustainable design, and higher energy efficiency with greater quality.

The MHS Aluminum Post and Beam Framing can be remaining exposed to the interior and exterior of the building or cover with any of enclosure building systems.
MHS Aluminum Framing™ structures exhibit a strength and aesthetic quality not found in the other conventionally framed houses. MHS Aluminum Framing™ are extruded by ASTM standards, pre-cut, and fabricated at the factory, then structural member and accessories sent to the construction site base on project shop drawings where they can be quickly assembled by a contractor’s crew, without using a heavy equipment.

A True Green architecture



The Modular Housing System (MHS) was developed by Tim Siahatgar, founder and CEO of Unique Structural Systems.
This system is composed of MHS aluminum structural members connected by a patented, quick connect bolt and clamp technology. Typically it is designed to be used with SIPs or other panels which fit within the unique channel configurations of the framing members.

Siahatgar notes that the growth of aluminum industry, advanced extrusion machinery, the characteristic and properties of aluminum as a material have led to evolutionary and innovative changes in building techniques, architectural and engineering projects.
MHS works to foster effective collaboration between all the members of the MHS design and construction teams with the goal of using this technology in a cost-effective way to meet each client’s particular needs. The MHS aluminum-based system works ideally with standard SIPs or with metal-skinned and hardwood SIPs as alternatives which require further finishing for wall covering and siding. While the twin grooves in the extruded aluminum framing members were designed to be fitted with almost any kind of panel, the strength of the SIP is preferred. Thus, walls can be assembled using a weather-resistant panel on the exterior surface side of the framing component, such as sheet metal, foamed aluminum panel or even ferro-cement panel. On the interior side the groove can be fitted with a hardwood dovetail board, cork, cloth-covered panel or simple drywall. Due to the fact that panels are set within the flanges of the channels at all four sides, issues or problems with panel connections are eliminated.
In designing a modernist, pavilion home one eliminates this issue altogether by relying on window walls for most of the exterior, with light partitions and sliding panel screens inside. The ability of the MHS system to integrate smalleText Colorr-scale US Systems framing units means there is a ready method of integrating built-in furnishings, an advantage in approaching the next stage of construction.
Due to the unique properties of aluminum (among them its light weight) and the patented bolt-and-clamp connections, the MHS system offers some degree of superiority over stick framing in resisting almost every hazard or disaster scenario. Among its attributes are green, recyclable components, true modular design versatility, high earthquake resistance and open architecture

Perhaps the most innovative feature of the MHS is its reuse and re-relocatability –precisely the feature that stud frame construction is lacking. With MHS one can freely and quickly disassemble, repair or modify, and then reassemble structures without causing any damage to the components and materials using little more than a few hand tools. Combined with the virtues of modular space frame geometry, this affords the system a flexibility, capability and economy impossible with other methods of construction.